Long-term outcome of pediatric renal transplantation with donors younger than 6 years.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is currently the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the use of kidneys from donors under 6 years of age as a possibility to increase the organ pool in pediatric recipients remains a controversial matter. We aimed to investigate whether donor age is associated to the long-term functionality of the renal graft. Likewise, we analyzed the adaptation of the graft to the ascending functional requirements in the pediatric patient. METHODS: Retrospective study of the results obtained in pediatric recipients transplanted with grafts from donors between 3 and 6 years of age, comparing them with those of grafts from donors older than 6 years. Among the variables compared are cumulative graft survival, renal size, need for antiproteinuric therapy, GFR, incidence of rejection, pyelonephritis, renal failure and surgical or tumor complications. RESULTS: A total of 43 transplants were performed with donors aged 3-6 years, and 42 transplants with donors older than 6 years. Cumulative graft survival at 5 years was 81% for the younger donor group compared to 98% for the older donor group (p < .05). At 8 years, cumulative graft survival for donors <6 years was 74%. As for the mean estimated graft survival, it was 11.52 years for the younger donor group and 14.51 years for older donors. During follow-up, the younger donor group presented greater renal enlargement and need for antiproteinuric therapy. The older donors group had a higher GFR during the first year of follow-up, which then equalized in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of acute or chronic rejection, acute pyelonephritis, acute renal failure or surgical or tumor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplants of grafts equal to or less than 6 years old have good short-term and acceptable long-term results in pediatric patients.

How does the number of training years in pediatric surgery affect appendectomy outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Appendectomy has traditionally been considered as a training operation for junior pediatric surgeons during their training period. However, with the increase of laparoscopic appendectomy, there has been a growing concern about the performance of this procedure by junior trainees. Our aim is to analyze intra-/postoperative appendectomy outcomes according to the number of training years during Pediatric Surgical residency training program. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent appendectomy between 2018 and 2021 in our institution, who were divided into 5 groups according to the number of training years of the junior surgeon who performed the intervention (Y1-Y5). Demographics, complicated appendicitis rate, operation time, and postoperative complications were compared. A stratified analysis according to the technique performed (open/laparoscopic) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1274 appendectomized patients were analyzed, of which 1257 (98.7%) were operated on by junior trainees (81 in Y1; 407 in Y2; 337 in Y3; 261 in Y4; and 171 in Y5) without demographic differences between groups. As the year of training increased, an elevation in complicated appendicitis rate was observed, although without statistically significant differences. However, laparoscopic/open appendectomies ratio increased with increasing year of training (p < 0.001). Operative time decreased significantly with increasing year of training (p < 0.001), both in open and laparoscopic appendectomies. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, nor in the stratified analysis according to surgical technique. CONCLUSION: Appendectomy performed by junior pediatric surgery trainees can be considered a safe procedure from the first year of training, regardless of the technique used.

Indocyanine green navigation in minimally invasive resection of multiple metachronous pulmonary metastases of hepatoblastoma.

Pulmonary metastases from hepatoblastoma (HB) have traditionally been identified by preoperative computed tomography scan image evaluation, and intraoperative visual and palpatory examinations through thoracotomy have been generally recommended. However, the safety and accuracy of surgery can be problematic in patients with small multiple lung metastases due to postoperative respiratory dysfunction risk secondary to decreased residual lung capacity in wedge resections. We present an 8-month-old patient with metastatic HB with multiple metachronous pulmonary lesions in whom thoracoscopic lung resections were performed guided by indocyanine green (ICG) administered intravenously 24 h earlier (0.5 mg/kg). ICG fluorescence allowed identification and limited resection of lung parenchyma, avoiding postoperative respiratory dysfunction. A total of 16 lung lesions were resected during four operations (two bilateral and two right thoracoscopies), with no postoperative complications. ICG-guided thoracoscopic surgery allowed identification and resection of metastatic nodules in both lungs during the same procedure, achieving a hospital stay of less than 3 days for each intervention. The patient is currently 24 months old and remains asymptomatic, with no distant disease at the last imaging control. ICG-guided resection via a thoracoscopic approach is particularly useful in patients with multiple and/or metachronous metastases requiring multiple surgical interventions.

Does the timing of appendectomy affect outcomes and postoperative complications?

PURPOSE: There is controversy about the necessity of nighttime appendectomy. The aim of this study was to determine whether timing of appendectomy performance plays a role on postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective single-center comparative study was performed in children who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis between 2017 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups based on the time slot in which surgery was performed: morning (8:00 h-15:00 h), afternoon (15:00 h-22:00 h) and night (22:00 h-08:00 h). Demographics, intraoperative data, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: A total of 1643 patients were included: 337 were operated in the morning, 751 in the afternoon and 555 at night. We found no demographic differences. When comparing the intraoperative data, no differences were observed in the percentage of complicated appendicitis. Night group patients presented a higher percentage of open appendectomies (64.5%) when compared to afternoon (49.6%) and morning (46.2%) groups (p < 0.001). Surgery time was also significantly shorter in the night group (45.2 min ± 18.9 min) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in length of hospital stay, postoperative complications rate or readmission rate. CONCLUSION: These results show that in our institution time slot in which the appendectomy is performed has no consequences in postoperative outcomes and complications.

The role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in avoiding negative appendectomies.

INTRODUCTION: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory biomarker that is easily calculated with data from the differential white blood cell count. The aim of our study was to analyse the role of the NLR in the detection of negative appendectomies and to compare its usefulness with other clinical, sonographic and laboratory factors previously described. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in patients aged less than 16 years who underwent appendectomy in our hospital between 2017 and 2020. We divided patients into 2 groups based on appendiceal histological findings: NA group (negative appendicitis: absence of appendiceal inflammation) and PA group (positive appendicitis: presence of inflammation in any layer of the appendiceal wall). We analysed demographic, clinical, sonographic and laboratory characteristics. RESULTS: We included a total of 1269 patients, 1244 in the PA group and 25 in the NA group, with no differences between groups in demographic characteristics. The proportion of patients that presented with nausea and vomiting was significantly smaller in the NA group compared to the PA group (P < .001), and there were no other differences in symptoms. The appendiceal diameter on ultrasound was significantly smaller in the NA group (8.1 ±â€¯2.1 vs. 9.7 ±â€¯2.8 mm; P < .001). The white blood cell and neutrophil counts and the NLR were significantly higher in the PA group (P < .001), as was the level of C-reactive protein (18.6 vs. 2.6; P = .005). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the NLR was the parameter with the highest AUC (0.879) for the diagnosis of negative appendicitis, with a cut-off point of 2.65 for a maximum sensitivity of 84.2% and specificity of 83.8%. CONCLUSION: The NLR is the preoperative parameter that best discriminates patients without acute appendicitis. Values of less than 2.65 should make clinicians contemplate diagnoses other than appendicitis.

Microtia Ear Reconstruction with Patient-Specific 3D Models-A Segmentation Protocol.

(1) Background: In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) templates have replaced traditional two-dimensional (2D) templates as visual guides during intra-operative carving of the autogenous cartilage framework in microtia reconstruction. This study aims to introduce a protocol of the fabrication of patient-specific, 3D printed and sterilizable auricular models for autogenous auricular reconstruction. (2) Methods: The patient's unaffected ear was captured with a high-resolution surface 3D scan (Artec Eva) and post-processed in order to obtain a clean surface model (STL format). In the next step, the ear was digitally mirrored, segmented and separated into its component auricle parts for reconstruction. It was disassembled into helix, antihelix, tragus and base and a physical model was 3D printed for each part. Following this segmentation, the cartilage was carved in the operating room, based on the models. (3) Results: This segmentation technique facilitates the modeling and carving of the scaffold, with adequate height, depth, width and thickness. This reduces both the surgical time and the amount of costal cartilage used. (4) Conclusions: This segmentation technique uses surface scanning and 3D printing to produce sterilizable and patient-specific 3D templates.

Aesthetic forehead reduction in female patients: Surgical details and analysis of outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Primary aesthetic hairline lowering, also known as forehead reduction, is a relatively unexplored procedure, and the perceived satisfaction with outcome has not been previously discussed in scientific literature. The objectives of this study were to review the surgical technique and to analyze outcome assessing objective reduction, improvement of facial balance, patient satisfaction, and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients seeking aesthetic forehead reduction since 2010. Inclusion criteria were as follows: women with a high but stable hairline. We excluded smokers, those seeking combined surgery, and those who had history of scalp surgery or hair loss. All patients were operated following the same protocol. Forehead reduction was measured comparing the pre- and postoperative distance from the glabella to the trichion. Improvement in facial balance was assessed comparing the pre- and postoperative quotient between the upper and middle thirds of the face. The forehead FACE-Q tool and the Vancouver Scar Scale were used to assess patient satisfaction. All complications were registered with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Twenty-six women aged 16 to 56 years were included. The average reduction was 2.03 cm. The facial balance quotient improved from 1:1.44 preoperatively to 1:1.05 postoperatively (p < 0.01). Both the forehead FACE-Q and the Vancouver Scar Scale showed significantly positive results. Complications included transient scalp numbness in 23 subjects, small areas of scar widening in 3 patients, and minor seroma in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: With meticulous execution, aesthetic forehead reduction in female patients is effective and safe, resulting in high patient satisfaction. The FACE-Q is owned by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and was used with permission for this research.